Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Medicina Interna de Mexico ; 38(1):67-74, 2022.
Article in Spanish | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2326492

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explored whether initial laboratory data and symptoms predict further clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Clinical records from March to September 2020 were revised to extract clinical-demographic characteristics, laboratory data and outcomes from patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, admitted to Centro Medico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City. RESULT(S): One thousand three patients were evaluated at the Emergency-Triage, diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 and received further in-hospital medical attention. Most of the patients were younger than 65 years-old, male and showed co-morbid conditions, such as obesity, hypertension or diabetes mellitus. After standard therapy, 389 cases (39%) required mechanical ventilation, vasopressor agents or showed fatal outcome. Higher values of C-reactive protein, D-dimer, procalcitonin and low O2 saturation at triage significantly predicted mechanical ventilation (p <0.05) and mortality (p <0.05);while presenting symptoms like fever, myalgia, cough and ageusia showed a particular association with longer hospital stage (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION(S): Laboratory values and presenting symptoms, both evaluated at hospital admission, showed different ability to predict clinical severity, mortality and longer hospitalization time in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. These results could be useful in possible future pandemic waves of SARS-CoV-2.Copyright © 2022 Comunicaciones Cientificas Mexicanas S.A. de C.V.. All rights reserved.

2.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 11(1): e28, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2310904

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Several clinical manifestations have been discovered for COVID-19 since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, which can be classified into early, medium, and long-term complications. However, late complications can be present after recovery from acute COVID-19 illness. The present study aims to comprehensively review the available evidence of late complications related to COVID-19. Method: A search was conducted, using keywords, through electronic databases, which included Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase up to August 29, 2022. Study selection was performed according to a strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was followed, and studies were appraised using the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment and risk of bias tool. Results: In total, 50 studies were included, and nine distinct COVID-19 late complication categories were identified. A review of these studies revealed that neurologic and psychiatric (n=41), respiratory (n=27), musculoskeletal and rheumatologic (n=22), cardiovascular (n=9), and hepatic and gastrointestinal (n=6) complications were the most prevalent complications of long COVID-19. Conclusion: Almost all human body systems are affected by late complications of COVID-19 with different severity and prevalence. Fatigue and some other neuropsychiatric symptoms are the most common late complications among long COVID-19 patients. Respiratory symptoms including dyspnea (during exercise), cough, and chest tightness were the next most prevalent long-term complications of COVID-19. Since these complications are persistent and late, being aware of the signs and symptoms is essential for the healthcare providers and patients.

3.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(7)2023 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298504

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity between online evaluations (OEs) and face-to-face evaluations (IPEs) of a Senior Fitness Test and two balance tests in people with low back pain (LBP). Forty participants of 58.48 (9.87) years were included. The 30 s chair stand-up, arm curl, 2 min step, chair-sit and reach, back scratch, 8 foot up-and-go, sharpened Romberg, and one-legged stance tests were administrated using both OE and IPE methods. The results indicated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two methods except in the 8-foot up-and-go test (p = 0.007). Considering the ICC values and Bland-Altman plots, excellent agreement was found for the chair-sit and reach test, moderate agreement for the arm-curl and 8-foot up-and-go tests, and good agreement for the other tests. Strong correlations (p < 0.001) were observed in all variables except for the arm-curl and 8-foot up-and-go tests, where moderate correlations were found (p < 0.05). These results support the validity of OEs and IPEs in all tests, except for the arm-curl and 8-foot up-and-go tests, where lower ICC values and moderate correlations were found. However, it is important to consider the range of fluctuation of the ICC and the significant values obtained through correlations.

4.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2269011

ABSTRACT

Background: SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as a novel pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Aims and objectives: We aimed to compare characteristics, clinical outcomes and pneumococcal identification in patients with COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 CAP. Method(s): EGNATIA is an ongoing, prospective study of adults >=19yo hospitalized with clinical and radiographicallyconfirmed CAP in Greece. The primary objective is to estimate the proportion of CAP due to pneumococcal serotypes included in 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). Pneumococcus was identified using serotype-specific urinary antigen detection assays (UAD 1/2), BinaxNow and conventional cultures. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed as per national guidelines. Result(s): We compared 202 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia during Apr2020-Mar2021 vs 1033 patients with nonCOVID-19 CAP during Nov2017-Oct2020. Patients with COVID-19 were younger (median age 68.8 vs 75.8 years) and had fewer comorbidities (67.8% with >=1 underlying condition vs 79.2%) than non-COVID-19 patients. Patients with COVID-19 less frequently reported past pneumonia episodes (0.5% vs 7.7%) but were more frequently nursing home residents (13.9% vs 6%). Patients with COVID-19 had less severe pneumonia presentation (CURB 65 3-5 6.4% vs 30.5%;PSI IV-V 41.1% vs 55.2%) but required mechanical ventilation more frequently (7.4% vs 1.9%) and had a longer hospital stay (mean 17.4 vs 9.6 days). In-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 groups (7.9% in COVID-19 vs 8.9% in non-COVID-19). Pneumococcus was identified less frequently in patients with COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 CAP (4% vs 11.1%). Conclusion(s): Significant differences were identified in patients with COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 CAP.

5.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research ; 15(2):1275-1281, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2258553

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 infection is associated with multi-organ involvement. Neurological manifestations are seen in COVID-19 infection due to endothelial damage and prothrombotic state. Thus the importance of early detection or identifying the patients with high risk for developing cerebrovascular manifestations that could end up in disability and a worse overall prognosis has lead to the study of stroke characteristics in association with COVID-19. Objective(s): To study the acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) manifestations in patients infected with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Methods and Materials: Our study is a retrospective from July 2020 to September 2020 for a period of 3 months done in confirmed Covid-19 infection (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive) who are admitted in our tertiary care hospital. Diagnosing of stroke was confirmed either by Computed Tomography(CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain. The inclusion criteria were as follows: RT PCR confirmed Covid 19 cases, who developed acute cerebrovascular accident in the patient. Exclusion Criteria Include: Known case of stroke, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertensive cases and morbid obesity patients. Result(s): Out of 8489 covid-19 confirmed cases in our hospital nearly 10 cases developed neurological manifestations who had no other co morbidities or risk factors. Out of 10 patients, 7 patients were male and 3 patients were female. Out of 10 cases 20% of cases were among the age group of 25-40 years of age, another 70% belongs to 40-50 years of age & 10% of cases belongs to age group 50-60years. Thus majority of our cases were around age group 40-50 years. Majority of our patients (60%) developed cerebrovascular accident on day 3-6 of onset of symptoms. All our patients had high sensitivity C-reactive protein above 10mg/ml and 60% had their serum ferritin value >550ng/ml. Majority of our patients had their D-dimer value >10000ng/ml. Most of our patients(50%) belongs to severe category of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).Majority of our patients who developed stroke had improved (70%), nearly 10% had no improvement and 20% died. All our patients developed ischemic stroke. Conclusion(s): From our study we seen that middle aged male between 40-50 yrs. who are infected with covid-19 infection with no comorbiditites and with higher inflammatory markers had developed ischemic stroke when compared to the usual age >60 years with comorbidities in non-covid patients. Thus we conclude that covid 19 infection is to be considered as an individual risk factor for developing stroke. D-dimer level more than 3 fold increase and high C-reactive protein should alarm the physician to start on early treatment of steroids and anticoagulants.. Thus early detection of inflammatory markers and early start of anticoagulants and steroids resulted in good outcome of the patients. Repeat inflammatory markers should be done at the end of the treatment and if it is still elevated, patient should be discharged with oral steroids, antiplatelets and statins even with no comorbidities and symptoms. Anyhow studies with bigger sample size is needed to validate these results.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.

6.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(5)2023 02 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273054

ABSTRACT

Patient perception and the organizational and safety culture of health professionals are an indirect indicator of the quality of care. Both patient and health professional perceptions were evaluated, and their degree of coincidence was measured in the context of a mutual insurance company (MC Mutual). This study was based on the secondary analysis of routine data available in databases of patients' perceptions and professionals' evaluations of the quality of care provided by MC Mutual during the period 2017-2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Eight dimensions were considered: the results of care, coordination of professionals, trust-based care, clinical and administrative information, facilities and technical means, confidence in diagnosis, and confidence in treatment. The patients and professionals agreed on the dimension of confidence in treatment (good), and the dimensions of coordination and confidence in diagnosis (poor). They diverged on confidence in treatment, which was rated worse by patients than by professionals, and on results, information and infrastructure, which were rated worse by professionals only. This implies that care managers have to reinforce the training and supervision activities of the positive coincident aspects (therapy) for their maintenance, as well as the negative coincident ones (coordination and diagnostic) for the improvement of both perceptions. Reviewing patient and professional surveys is very useful for the supervision of health quality in the context of an occupational mutual insurance company.


Subject(s)
Pandemics , Quality of Health Care , Humans , COVID-19 , Patient Satisfaction , Perception , Physician-Patient Relations
7.
Clin Med Res ; 20(4): 236-240, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2198388

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 infection is known to cause thromboembolic complications. This is why patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are put on prophylactic anticoagulation. We present the case of a Caucasian woman, aged 71 years, with risk factors of class 1 obesity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, initially admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia, and later developed acute mesenteric ischemia followed by pulmonary embolism. These incidents occurred while the patient was receiving high-dose prophylactic enoxaparin (40 mg twice daily). COVID-19 associated acute mesenteric ischemia is a complication with high mortality. Therefore, high suspicion, early recognition, and surgical management is necessary. Apart from that, this case emphasizes the question of whether there is a need for proactively administering therapeutic anticoagulation for high thrombotic risk COVID-19 patients to prevent deadly complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mesenteric Ischemia , Female , Humans , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Mesenteric Ischemia/surgery , Mesenteric Ischemia/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome
8.
Clin Pract ; 12(4): 640-652, 2022 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2023228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tele-prehabilitation is a behaviour change intervention that facilities the modification of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. Understanding patients' experiences of tele-prehabilitation provides important insights into service improvement. In this study, we aimed to describe our patients' perceptions of tele-prehabilitation and capture their capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to participate. This was a qualitative study to inform our service design and delivery. METHODS: Following purposive sampling, 22 qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with patients in the community that had completed tele-prehabilitation. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Deductive content analysis was used to map the identified themes against theoretical determinants of health behaviour change. RESULTS: We conducted 22 interviews. Our patients described their overall experience of tele-prehabilitation as positive and provided important insights that impacted their capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to engage with our service. Our team provided them the capabilities and self-efficacy to engage by personalising multimodal plans and setting goals. The remote delivery of our service was a recurring positive theme in providing flexibility and widening accessibility to participation. A missed opportunity was the potential for peer support through shared experiences with other patients. Patients showed greater motivation to participate for immediate perioperative benefit compared to long-term health gains. CONCLUSION: Patients' experiences and perspectives of tele-prehabilitation can be enhanced by incorporating the findings from this qualitative study into service redesign and delivery. We recommend: (1) applying holistic principles in care and goal-setting, (2) delivering a combination of home-based and in-centre programmes, and (3) engaging with patients at the start of their cancer journey when they are most motivated. In turn, this can result in more effective uptake, improve adherence to interventions, and greater satisfaction.

9.
Cureus ; 14(6): e25621, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1924647

ABSTRACT

Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is a global health threat that has affected patient care enormously. Moderate to severe asthma was listed as a risk factor for severe SARS-CoV-2 disease by the Centers for Disease Control. Little is known about the impact of the pandemic on asthma control in children, particularly African American children. Objective The present study sought to determine how changes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected asthma metrics in a majority African American pediatric population at a pediatric pulmonology clinic in a community hospital in New York. Methods This is a retrospective, pre-post, comparative cross-sectional study that included children three to 18 years of age with a known diagnosis of asthma followed in a pulmonary clinic. Data were gathered from electronic medical records. Subjects were selected if they presented to a pulmonology clinic within a certain time window both before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcome variables included asthma medication statistics and healthcare utilization statistics. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 104 pediatric patients. The majority were African American. Emergency department visits, primary physician visits, and hospitalizations significantly decreased in the post-COVID study group compared to the pre-COVID control group. Conclusion Among a majority African American pediatric population, there were significant improvements in asthma outcomes after COVID-19 societal changes when compared to before COVID-19 based on outcome variables.

10.
World J Pediatr Surg ; 5(3): e000403, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1883307

ABSTRACT

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, our group implemented preoperative video visits (VVs) to limit physical contact. The aim of this study was to determine caregivers' and providers' perceptions of this practice and to determine feasibility for continuation. Methods: All patients who had only a preoperative VV prior to an elective surgery were identified from March-October 2020. Caregivers, surgeons, and clinic staff were surveyed about their experiences. Results: Thirty-four preoperative VVs were followed by an elective surgery without a preceding in-person visit. Of the 31 caregiver surveys completed, the majority strongly agreed that the VV was more convenient (87%, n=27). Eighty-one percent (n=25) strongly agreed or agreed that the VV saved them money. Ninety-four percent (n=29) strongly agreed or agreed that they would choose the VV option again. Caregivers saved an average travel distance of 60.3 miles one way (range 6.1-480). Of the 13/17 providers who responded, 77% (n=10) expressed that the practice should continue. Conclusions: Virtual health became a necessity during the pandemic, and caregivers were overwhelmingly satisfied. Continuing VVs as an option beyond the pandemic may be a reasonable and effective way to help eliminate some of the hurdles that impede healthcare-seeking behavior and should be offered.

11.
Frontiers in Emergency Medicine ; 6(3), 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1876299

ABSTRACT

Objective: We aimed to investigate the extent of pulmonary involvement and adverse outcomes in patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/ angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) versus who did not, in hospitalized coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Method: All COVID-19 patients with a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, who were admitted to our tertiary referral hospitals in Tehran, Iran between January 2021 and May 2021, and had an on-admission chest computed tomography (CT) scan, were included. The patients were divided into two groups (receiving ACEI/ARB and who did not) for further analysis. The outcomes of interest in our study were the extent of pulmonary involvement, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. Results: A total of 893 participants (mean age of 58.6±15.4 years;female, 522 (58.4%)) were enrolled. Among them, 368 (41.2%) participants had hypertension, and use of ACEI/ARB was reported in 183 (20.5%) participants. Of all, 409 (45.8%) participants required ICU admission, and 259 (29%) participants succumbed to death. We found that participants who received ACEI/ARB were less likely to progress critical disease and experienced significantly lower ICU admission (P=0.022) and death (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities, this relationship remained statistically significant for death (odds ratio (OR): 0.23 [0.14-0.38], P<0.001) and ICU admission (OR: 0.49 [0.32-0.73], P=0.001). Conclusion: Our findings showed that COVID-19 patients who receiving ACEI/ARB prior to hospitalization vs. those who did not, had more favorable outcomes. © 2022 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

12.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(6): 759-766, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1764861

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is the study plan of the Karolinska NeuroCOVID study, a study of neurocognitive impairment after severe COVID-19, relating post-intensive care unit (ICU) cognitive and neurological deficits to biofluid markers and MRI. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed enormous health challenges to individuals and health-care systems worldwide. An emerging feature of severe COVID-19 is that of temporary and extended neurocognitive impairment, exhibiting a myriad of symptoms and signs. The causes of this symptomatology have not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: In this study, we aim to investigate patients treated for severe COVID-19 in the ICU, as to describe and relate serum-, plasma- and cerebrospinal fluid-borne molecular and cellular biomarkers of immune activity, coagulopathy, cerebral damage, neuronal inflammation, and degeneration, to the temporal development of structural and functional changes within the brain as evident by serial MRI and extensive cognitive assessments at 3-12 months after ICU discharge. RESULTS: To date, we have performed 51 3-month follow-up MRIs in the ICU survivors. Of these, two patients (~4%) have had incidental findings on brain MRI findings requiring activation of the Incidental Findings Management Plan. Furthermore, the neuropsychological and neurological examinations have so far revealed varying and mixed patterns. Several patients expressed cognitive and/or mental concerns and fatigue, complaints closely related to brain fog. CONCLUSION: The study goal is to gain a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms and neurological consequences of this new disease, with a special emphasis on neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes, in order to identify targets of intervention and rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Biomarkers , Critical Care , Humans , Survivors/psychology
13.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 10(12): e31995, 2021 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1595985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acquired brain injuries (ABIs) commonly cause cognitive-communication disorders, which can have a pervasive psychosocial impact on a person's life. More than 135 million people worldwide currently live with ABI, and this large and growing burden is increasingly surpassing global rehabilitation service capacity. A web-based service delivery model may offer a scalable solution. The Social Brain Toolkit is an evidence-based suite of 3 web-based communication training interventions for people with ABI and their communication partners. Successful real-world delivery of web-based interventions such as the Social Brain Toolkit requires investigation of intervention implementation in addition to efficacy and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the implementation and effectiveness of the Social Brain Toolkit as a web-based service delivery model. METHODS: This is a mixed methods, prospective, hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study, theoretically underpinned by the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework of digital health implementation. We will document implementation strategies preemptively deployed to support the launch of the Social Brain Toolkit interventions, as well as implementation strategies identified by end users through formative evaluation of the Social Brain Toolkit. We will prospectively observe implementation outcomes, selected on the basis of the NASSS framework, through quantitative web analytics of intervention use, qualitative and quantitative pre- and postintervention survey data from all users within a specified sample frame, and qualitative interviews with a subset of users of each intervention. Qualitative implementation data will be deductively analyzed against the NASSS framework. Quantitative implementation data will be analyzed descriptively. We will obtain effectiveness outcomes through web-based knowledge tests, custom user questionnaires, and formal clinical tools. Quantitative effectiveness outcomes will be analyzed through descriptive statistics and the Reliable Change Index, with repeated analysis of variance (pretraining, posttraining, and follow-up), to determine whether there is any significant improvement within this participant sample. RESULTS: Data collection commenced on July 2, 2021, and is expected to conclude on June 1, 2022, after a 6-month sample frame of analytics for each Social Brain Toolkit intervention. Data analysis will occur concurrently with data collection until mid-2022, with results expected for publication late 2022 and early 2023. CONCLUSIONS: End-user evaluation of the Social Brain Toolkit's implementation can guide intervention development and implementation to reach and meet community needs in a feasible, scalable, sustainable, and acceptable manner. End user feedback will be directly incorporated and addressed wherever possible in the next version of the Social Brain Toolkit. Learnings from these findings will benefit the implementation of this and future web-based psychosocial interventions for people with ABI and other populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001170819; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001170819, Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001177842; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001177842, Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001180808; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001180808. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/31995.

14.
Health Sci Rep ; 4(4): e417, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1479406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hospital readmissions among COVID-19 patients have increased the load on the healthcare systems and added more pressure to hospital capacity. This affects the ability to accommodate newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients and other non-COVID-19 patients who require hospitalization. Therefore, this systematic review aims to understand the rates of and risk factors for hospital readmissions and all-cause mortality among COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized after being discharged following index hospitalization. METHODS: Our systematic review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021232324) and prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), MedRxiv, Web of Science (Science Citation Index), ProQuest Coronavirus research database, Cochrane Covid-19 study register, and WHO COVID-19: Global literature on coronavirus disease will be identified from December 31, 2019, to May 31, 2021. Two investigators will independently screen titles and abstracts and select studies reporting hospital readmissions among COVID-19 patients. Further, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be carried out separately by these independent reviewers. We will extract data on demographics, readmissions, all-cause mortality, emergency department visits, comorbidities, and factors associated with hospitalization among COVID-19 patients. Random-effect meta-analysis will be performed if homogeneous groups of studies are found. The combined evidence will be further stratified according to important background characteristics if the data allow. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize the available epidemiological evidence regarding rates of hospital readmissions, comorbidities, and related factors among COVID-19 patients who were readmitted after index hospitalization. A better understanding of the relationship between patient profiles and the rate of hospitalization will be helpful in the development of guidelines for patient management.

16.
Chest ; 160(6): 2135-2145, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1340589

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of obesity is rising worldwide. Adipose tissue exerts anatomic and physiological effects with significant implications for critical illness. Changes in respiratory mechanics cause expiratory flow limitation, atelectasis, and V̇/Q̇ mismatch with resultant hypoxemia. Altered work of breathing and obesity hypoventilation syndrome may cause hypercapnia. Challenging mask ventilation and peri-intubation hypoxemia may complicate intubation. Patients with obesity are at increased risk of ARDS and should receive lung-protective ventilation based on predicted body weight. Increased positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), coupled with appropriate patient positioning, may overcome the alveolar decruitment and intrinsic PEEP caused by elevated baseline pleural pressure; however, evidence is insufficient regarding the impact of high PEEP strategies on outcomes. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be safely performed in patients with obesity. Fluid management should account for increased prevalence of chronic heart and kidney disease, expanded blood volume, and elevated acute kidney injury risk. Medication pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics may be altered by hydrophobic drug distribution to adipose depots and comorbid liver or kidney disease. Obesity is associated with increased risk of VTE and infection; appropriate dosing of prophylactic anticoagulation and early removal of indwelling catheters may decrease these risks. Obesity is associated with improved critical illness survival in some studies. It is unclear whether this reflects a protective effect or limitations inherent to observational research. Obesity is associated with increased risk of intubation and death in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ongoing molecular studies of adipose tissue may deepen our understanding of how obesity impacts critical illness pathophysiology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Obesity/complications , Obesity/physiopathology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Critical Illness , Humans , Respiration, Artificial
17.
World J Pediatr Surg ; 4(1): e000257, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1318224

ABSTRACT

Background: Within the last decade, the use of telemedicine within in primary care in the USA has greatly expanded; however, use remains uncommon in surgical specialties. The spread of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prompted healthcare institutions to limit in-person contact, resulting in an increase in telemedicine across all specialties, including pediatric surgery. The aims of this review were to evaluate potential barriers that limited the use of telemedicine in pediatric surgery prior to the COVID-19 period and to define how best to incorporate its use into a pediatric surgical practice going forward. Methods: A scoping review was performed to identify gaps in the literature pertaining to the use of telemedicine within general pediatric surgery in the USA prior to the outbreak of COVID-19. Next, a focused evaluation of the legislative and organizational policies on telemedicine was performed. Lastly, findings were summarized and recommendations for future research developed in the context of understanding and overcoming barriers that have plagued widespread adoption in the past. Results: Despite evidence of telemedicine being safe and well received by adult surgical patients, a total of only three studies representing original research on the use of telemedicine within pediatric surgery were identified. Legislative and organizational policies regarding telemedicine have been altered in response to COVID-19, likely resulting in an increase in the use of telemedicine among pediatric surgeons. Conclusions: Telemedicine offers a safe and effective option for patients seeking an alternative to the in-person clinic appointment. The increased utilization of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic will provide an opportunity to learn how best to leverage the technology to decrease disparities and to overcome previous barriers.

18.
Emerg Radiol ; 27(6): 691-699, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-871494

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate chest computed tomography (CT) findings of laboratory-confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and correlate it with clinical and laboratorial signs of severe disease and short-term outcome. METHODS: Chest CTs of 61 consecutive cases of COVID-19 disease that attended in our emergency department (ED) were reviewed. Three groups of patients classified according to the short-term follow-up were compared: (1) early-discharged from ED, (2) hospitalized on regular wards, and (3) admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). CT findings were also correlated with clinical and laboratorial features associated with severe disease. RESULTS: Median age was 52 years (IQR 39-63) with male predominance (60.7%). Most of the patients that did not require hospitalization had parenchymal involvement of less than 25% on CT (84.6%). Among hospitalized patients, interlobular septal thickening and extensive lung disease (> 50% of parenchyma) were significantly more frequent in ICU-admitted patients (P = 0.018 and P = 0.043, respectively). Interlobular septal thickening also correlated with longer ICU stay (P = 0.018). Low oxygen saturation (SpO2 ≤ 93%) was associated with septal thickening (P = 0.004), diffuse distribution (P = 0.016), and pleural effusion (P = 0.037) on CT. All patients with > 50% of parenchymal involvement showed SpO2 ≤ 93%. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (> 5.0 mg/dL) correlated with consolidation (P = 0.002), septal thickening (P = 0.018), diffuse distribution (P = 0.020), and more extensive parenchymal involvement (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Interlobular septal thickening on CT was associated with ICU admission and longer stay on ICU. Diffuse distribution, septal thickening, and more extensive lung involvement correlated with lower SpO2 and higher CRP levels. Patients that needed hospitalization and ICU admission presented more extensive lung disease on CT.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 16(1): 271-278, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-752618

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to correlate the clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, with fatal outcome. METHODS: We reviewed chest X-ray (CXR) features, clinical, and laboratory data of patients with reverse transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. The relationship with mortality was investigated by fitting a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included (170 males; mean age, 63 y). Most of the patients had 1 or more comorbidity (62%); fever (95%), and cough (60%) were the most common symptoms; CXR detected abnormalities in 88.6%, mainly showing ground-glass opacities (GGO) (90%) with bilateral (64%) and peripheral (46%) distribution.Multivariate analysis showed that age (P < 0.001; mortality of 59% in patients >66 y old; 5% at a younger age) and consolidation at CXR (P = 0.001; mortality of 11% with positive CXR; 2% in those without) represented the 2 most significant independent risk factors of mortality. Chronic pathologies, such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral GGO at CXR also showed a significant correlation with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We identified predictive factors for the fatal outcome of COVID-19 patients. The prognostic value of these findings can be useful for optimal patient management and resource allocation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Thoracic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
20.
SN Compr Clin Med ; 2(9): 1366-1376, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-718568

ABSTRACT

We investigated significant predictors of poor in-hospital outcomes for patients admitted with viral pneumonia during the COVID-19 outbreak in Tehran, Iran. Between February 22 and March 22, 2020, patients who were admitted to three university hospitals during the COVID-19 outbreak in Tehran, Iran were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and chest CT scan findings were gathered. Two radiologists evaluated the distribution and CT features of the lesions and also scored the extent of lung involvement as the sum of three zones in each lung. Of 228 included patients, 45 patients (19.7%) required ICU admission and 34 patients (14.9%) died. According to regression analysis, older age (OR = 1.06; P < 0.001), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 88% (OR = 2.88; P = 0.03), and higher chest CT total score (OR = 1.10; P = 0.03) were significant predictors for in-hospital death. The same three variables were also recognized as significant predictors for invasive respiratory support: SpO2 < 88% (OR = 3.97, P = 0.002), older age (OR = 1.05, P < 0.001), and higher CT total score (OR = 1.13, P = 0.008). Potential predictors of invasive respiratory support and in-hospital death in patients with viral pneumonia were older age, SpO2 < 88%, and higher chest CT score.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL